this week in tv

Political TV Fever!

I seem to be gaining a growing interest in politics…well at least TV politics. What started as a mild curiosity last summer, has quickly turned into a full fledged political TV addition. I’ve increasingly found myself drawn to political dramas and dramadies (dramatic comedies), and keep my radar on high alert at the sign of a potential new series.


The West Wing
: I’ve just finished the second season; I know, I know I’m about 7 years too  late. But in my defence I was about to turn 8 when the series originally aired so I’m going to say I wasn’t exactly in their target demographic! This show has been really refreshing to watch. Its definitely more of an adult drama through its tone and writing and I appreciate the lack of love triangles, the use of older actors (not old!) and the focus on politics as the source of drama. I know the series has been highly praised by political science professors and critics alike and its really not hard to see why, the show comes off as a smart drama with intellectual ideals. I will admit there are times when the show comes off as a bit preachy however I commend Sorkin for using a devout religious democrat (President Bartlet) and a smart, eloquent republican (Ainsley Hayes) rather than resorting to common stereotypes. I also commend Sorkin for not resorting to stereotypes against the Middle East, the original run was during 9/11, or cheap republican comebacks against George Bush, the entire series took place during his presidency. I’ll likely do a more in depth post on the series (just started season 4!), so expect that in the near future.

Scandal: If you’ve read my most recent entries, you’ll notice that many of them seem to be Scandal related. The protagonist of the series is Olivia Pope, a crisis manager, and her complicated love triangle with the first family. Because Olivia works in crisis management, the show deals with more salacious events rather than the seemingly everyday events portrayed in The West Wing.  While I appreciate that Shonda has chosen a republican as her presidential protagonist, he seems to have some very democratic views. Fitz was a governor from California, a state which is recent years has been more on the democratic side, his chief of staff is an openly gay male, and he hasn’t appeared to have a deep sense of faith by any means. Really the only republican sense we’ve had from him is his connection to ‘Big Oil’ (Hollis Doyle). I seem to have a love/hate annoyed relationship with this show. In my opinion the writing has vastly improved from the long winded repititious soliloquy filled pilot episode. The show has a stronger focus on the personal rather than the workplace (which is completely fine!) however there is a growing amount of drama for dramas sake rather than to extend the storyline. For instance take the revelation of Olivia’s father; while part of my weekly must-see television the series is quickly venturing into soap opera territory.


Political Animals:
A 6 episode mini-series that originally aired last summer on USA. I did a previous post on my thoughts on the pilot episode.  The series follows  Elaine Barrisch (Sigourney Weaver), a once presidential candidate, who is now Secretary of State, trying to make a name for herself in politics away from her promiscuous husband Bud Hammond(Ciarán Hinds). Bud just so happens to be a former president himself (Hilary and Bill Clinton anyone?). Sigourney Weaver and Ciarán Hinds are just a drop in the bucket in naming the well known actors involved with the series. While I do wish the series had been renewed for a second season, with the heavy hitting cast I wouldn’t be surprised if funding or scheduling were the issue. The main focus of the show is the turmoil surrounding the Hammond family, however we do get to see a fair bit of politics when Elaine Barrisch is in her element.

VeepAn HBO comedy series I started watching a couple weeks ago. Veep follows Selena Myer (Julia Louis- Dryfus) a fictions vice president and her senior staff. I find the series to be a refreshing take on politics, most likely due to the lighter nature of a comedy vs an hour long drama. While the entire cast is well portrayed, in my opinion the scene stealer is Gary Walsh, the vice president’s personal aide, portrayed by Tony Hale. Gary is extremely loyal, Selena’s confidante and carries a briefcase which he nicknames Leviathan! The series currently airs Sunday at 10 and its in its second season.

The Newsroom: Another series I began watching last summer (the new season begins airing on July 14th!). The series revolves around the fictional news network Atlanta Cable News (ACN) and their attempt to change the way the news is presented. After a very public tirade, Will McAvoy (a news anchor played by Jeff Daniels) returns to work to find a new executive producer, his ex-girlfriend MacKenzie McHale (Emily Mortimer) who criticizes the way he had previously been anchoring the news. She tells Will (who is currently leading in the ratings), that instead of reporting the actual facts he is just trying not to step on anyone’s toes. The changes they have made to the fictional station are brilliant. Will acts as both an educator and as judicator, both educating the public on real news issues while holding politicians and big-wigs to the words that they’ve promised. While this isn’t a show about politicians per say, given the setting at a cable news station its almost impossible NOT to mix politics and the news. The show is quite different from the West Wing, while the tone is very much the same, we don’t see any representation of the White House. Similarly to Political Animals, I did a post last summer on my thoughts for the complete first season; you can read it here.

Advertisements

Scandal: White Hat’s Back On

Dad

And season 2 has come to an end! Let me start off by saying that I basically jumped up and down in front of my screen when Olivia said that last eventful word. If you read my previous Scandal post, you would have read about my suspicions on Rowen’s identity being Olivia’s father. Now many seem to be unsure why Olivia’s own father would try to have her killed. The other common question seems to be who ousted Olivia as the President’s mistress? I have a couple theories for each so lets get right into the thick of things!

First off I loved how David Rosen was redeemed in this episode. Just a couple days ago I was watching an episode from Season 1 and found myself missing the dynamic between Olivia ‘the fixer’ and David ‘the attorney,’ it was a complex mix between friendship and obstacle with each carrying such an excellent rapport. I knew David had always had good intentions; at his core he always wears that metaphorical White Hat. However Pope and associates did ultimately ruin his career and completely embarrassed him. Its not surprising that he would experience  feelings of distain. One scenario I found odd was that it was never addressed that Olivia had opened the safe in front of David, I mean she didn’t try to hide the combination at all. If David hadn’t been talking to Billy Chambers, Charlie could have easily ousted the combination from him through threat alone. I also have a hard time believing Olivia doesn’t lock her office door at night. Considering the amount of confidential information she likely stores, it seems unlikely she would be that careless. On the other hand is no one else curious why the safe didn’t automatically lock up after that many failed attempts? You only get about 5 attempts to get the correct password for an email address, I would hope a safe would be a bit more secure!

Ok; onto my first theory! Why would Olivia’s own father try to have her killed!? Again I think this is a complicated scenario. On the one hand while in the hospital we see Cyrus questioning what Rowan will do to Olivia. Now Cyrus knows about B613, he knows the extents to which Rowan is willing to go; I mean if you’re willing to train individuals to drill into someones limb in order to get information theres no stopping what you might do. On the other hand we don’t know how many people know that Olivia is Rowen’s daughter. Considering his livelihood it doesn’t safe to have that information be public. I have a couple theories on the female assassin who was sent to Olivia’s house.

1. She was sent by Rowan to shoot Jake instead of Olivia. He knew Jake was going to disobey his orders and wanted to prevent any escape of confidential information

2. The gun she was going to shoot was more of a stun gun, releasing a sedative (rather than bullets) so she could bring Olivia to meet with her father without resistanceScreen Shot 2013-05-17 at 1.43.28 PM

I really have a hard time believing Rowan actually tried to kill his daughter. Considering Jake’s next task was to bring Olivia to him (to talk) it seems unlikely that he would suddenly go to such an extreme. I still believe that Rowan is doing all of this to, in his own way, protect Olivia and look out for her best interests. By having his agents available to safely move Olivia into his car after the release of her name as the Presidents mistress, he shows that in his own way he still cares.

I strongly believe that Rowan is sabotaging Olitz because he:
a) doesn’t believe Fitz is good enough for Olivia

b) doesn’t see the relationship ending well for his daughter

Consider what Jake said, his mission was to sleep with Olivia. Clearly Rowan has been gathering intel this whole time to sabotage the relationship; its lucky for him that Fitz killed Verna, adding more ammunition to his supply. As I said in my last post, this is a very soap opera-like turn for the series; but a Shonda show typically follows the extreme drama with unrealistic circumstances so its not too far off from something she would do.

Next: Who ousted Olivia as the Presidents mistress!? Again a lot of fingers seem to be pointing towards Mellie Grant Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 1.47.20 PMbut once again I don’t see her being involved here. It was evident during the second meeting between Hollis, Cyrus, Mellie, Fitz and Olivia that something was wrong between Olitz. They could barely look at each other! Mellie is power-hungry and if theres the slightest chance of a rift between Olitz, allowing her to swoop in and remain first lady, I can’t NOT see her taking that opportunity. She has the most to lose, in terms of her political career, through the divorce. Her public political views have been dormant at this time, and as the show mentioned by airing her dirty laundry to the public her approval ratings seem to be dropping. By airing your dirty laundry so publicly, there is no chance for an amicable divorce. Now that the public is involved and have their opinion on the matter its bound to become messy.

Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 1.49.44 PMIn my mind the two main suspects are Cyrus Beene and Rowan. Cyrus has a lot to lose by letting the secret out. If he was ever revealed to be the source, he would lose both Fitz and Olivia while at the same time almost single-handedly ruining Olivia’s reputation. However something he said in the episode struck a chord; he mentioned he was the only adult in the room. Mind you sneaking statements to the press isn’t really a mature tactic, but this relationship has been a thorn in his side for too long. He heard Olivia’s plan and this was his way to take back control, prevent public acceptance of Olivia. Leaving Fitz with no choice but to run for re-election with Mellie by his side. Lets not forget that James kept searching for information throughout the episode, it would be easy to ‘accidentally’ let Olivia’s name slip in front of him and let the cards fall where they may. By destroying the Cytron card Cyrus destroys the one thing that can bring down his political career, and while he does care for both Olivia and Fitz, Rowan’s words may have had an effect on him.

Rowan on the other hand is another very possible target. He seems invested in ruining Olitz and this way he is able to stop it Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 1.52.04 PMfrom ever coming out publicly. By painting the picture of Olivia as a home wrecker, she will never be accepted by the public if and when Fitz marries her. Yes its an extreme tactic to do to your own daughter, but as I previously mentioned its clear that Rowan has no bounds. The fact that he was waiting outside for Olivia with agents ready is another strike against him. Not that I would put it past him to have her followed, he is looking more and more suspicious.

Of course there is always the option that Rowan and Cyrus worked together to orchestrate this bombshell. And while I wouldn’t put it past Shonda to come up with something so shock-worthy this would be a completely different level of betrayal against Olivia.

General Thoughts on the Episode

1. Anyone else HATE the scene where Fitz crawls back to Mellie? He looked so spineless shuffling into that room. Hate seeing him that way

2. I’m suspicious at how fast Quinn picked up hacking. Huck has been trained for years so I don’t see how Quinn would be able to surpass his hacking skills in a matter of months.

3. I’m both curious and worried about the Dexter-like turn Quinn has made. I can understand why they are trying to develop this storyline; you can only write about a naive and confused girl for so long. But again it just seems SO sudden. While Huck did end up enjoying his torture methods and saw them as art, Quinn seems to be enjoying it much too quickly

4. Looks like Jake is getting the same treatment Huck had to ‘forget his family.’ Guessing Jake will need to ‘forget his relationship with Olivia.’

5. With the news of Billy Chambers being the White House mole, Fitz has stopped Sally Langston’s election bid in its tracks. Who would elect someone whose former chief of staff committed government treason?! Doesn’t exactly show the best of character. However with that baggage under her belt, will Fitz want her by his side once again as VP? With his own affair coming to light the pair are surrounded by a lot of drama.

6. So is Billy Chambers finally dead!?!

Cancellation Scorecard: What won’t be returning to your TV screens in the fall

Now that the majority of network television stations have announced their renewals and subsequent cancellations; its time to either rejoice or go on a binge marathon to remember your fallen favourites. Now of course this isn’t a complete list of all the cancelled TV shows, to see a complete list check out tvline.com’s post here. Unfortunately as with every television season there are some shows you grow attached to that won’t be returning *cue the sad faces and wailing.*

Lets get onto the chopping block:

ABC

Happy Endings: While this show did fair better than many others on the list, its one of the ones I’ll miss the most. Happy endings is about a group of 6 late 20-somethings living in Chicago. The crazy married couple, successful businessman Brad and the neurotic Monica-type Jane, Alex  Jane’s ditsy younger sister, Dave an aspiring restauranteur, Max the resident slacker who portrays an interesting and un-taped tv portrayal of a gay man, and lastly Penny the single klutzy serial dater.  Its hard to compare Happy Endings to other shows, it was kind of Friends meets How I Met Your Mother meets Cougar Town…with something else thrown in.

For all those Happy Endings fans out there, there might still be hope. Its been reported that Sony TV, which produces the show, has been shopping the show around to other networks. The cable network USA has expressed interest, best case scenario we get a move similar to Cougar Town (ABC to TBS). Now Happy Endings viewers know that the scheduling of the show has been off the rails this past year, it started off on Tuesday, got moved to Sunday, started airing new episodes on both Sunday and Tuesday before being banished to the Friday 2-episode burn-off. Confused yet? So were we! Forget trying to actually watch a show you enjoy, trying to keep track of when it was on proved to be a problem; anyways its nice to see Sony backing behind the series and I for one will be keeping my fingers crossed for another network pick-up! Here’s a clip from the show featuring Penny Hartz

CBS

Partners: I’ve mentioned this series cancellation in a previous post, however as you can tell I’m still pretty bummed by it. It was without a doubt my favourite offering of the 2012/2013 year and in my eyes it was cancelled much too soon. The series really hit its stride by the fourth episode but unfortunately it was cancelled after 6 episodes. I’ve heard that the show aired its full 13 episode season in South Africa, but for some odd reason those forgotten episodes haven’t managed to make their way online…yet. I know its likely a lost cause but I’d really love to see the last 7 episodes, I watched each of the 6 aired episodes on repeat and would like to see where they went with the storyline.

Tvline.com mentioned that NBC’s Do No Harm and ABC’s 666 Park Avenue and Zero Hour will finish out their Freshman season in the summer, a great move for fans who want closure to a series they’ve grown attached to. Come on CBS! Any chance for this happening with Partners??

FOX 

Fringe: I really can’t complain about this one, although the ratings weren’t great FOX gave the series a 5th season of 13 episodes to conclude the series. I’m a big fan of the science fiction genre and this show was so complex and well integrated. The series followed a team under the FBI who investigated ‘fringe events’ or strange scientific occurrences. The series  had a nice conclusion and gave viewers closure yet even in the finale remained true to its story. Although the finale was bittersweet, I’m still happy with the way the series ended.

 

Touch: Another show that I really became attached to. I’ve yet to watch the series finale (originally aired on May 10th 2013), however given that the series was only just cancelled I have a feeling it will be very open ended. The series revolves around former investigative journalist Martin Bohm and his special needs son Jake. Jake has never spoken a word in his life but is drawn to numbers and patterns and often uses numbers to communicate to his father. The series is unique in that although Martin and Jake move the story along, the real meat of the episode is through its guest stars. Every secondary character somehow relates to one another with everything coming full circle at the one hour mark. For all the Kiefer Sutherland fans out there, FOX has recently announced that the hit series 24 will be revived as a limited series, likely as a replacement to a possible movie.

NBC 

Guys with Kids: Although I wasn’t all that attached to this show its still one that I kept up with throughout the year. The series follows the lives of 3 friends as they raise their children in the city. Gary is a married stay at home father of 4 boys: Yoda, Clark and newborn twins  Robbie and GJ. Chris is a recent divorce who has partial custody of his newborn son Ernie; and lastly Zach is a married working father to pre-teen Violet and newborn Eddie. The series ran for 17 episodes, and although fun in my opinion wasn’t part of my must watch TV schedule.

The New Normal: Similarly to Guys with Kids, this show is another one that I’m not that upset about. The series follows a happy and successful gay couple Bryan, a television producer, and David, an obstetrician, and their relationship with their surrogate Goldie and her 9-year old daughter Shania. Justin Bartha and Andrew Rannalis definitely carried the series, and although it had a lot of heart, by the end of the season I just didn’t feel invested enough. Again not a series I’ll be crying over but a fun one to check out if you want easy summer TV.

Scandal Season 2: Who is the mole?

As we inch ever closer to the season 2 finale of ABC’s Scandal (airs May 16th 2013), the question on every fan’s mind is: Who is the white house mole!? With the second to last episode of the season airing in just under 5 hours, I thought I may as well put pen to paper  fingers to keyboard (?) and write out my possible subject combinations. With rumblings over the interweb (particularly over at tvline.com) that the identity of the mole is truly shocking, so much so that the actors themselves have said they were shocked during the table read. It only makes sense that the identity of the mole and their associate must be both someone who has a relatively active role on the show and has been portrayed as innocent. My head has been spinning over possible combinations, and my yearing for information hasn’t exactly been helped by the fact that I’ve just re-watched all of season 1. Side note I would have much rather had Olivia date Billy as opposed to the bore that is Senator Edison Davis…of course before he turned out to be the enemy. Billy’s dialogue has been full of one-liners that add some comedic flair to an otherwise heavily dramatic show. Anyways I digress….back to the potential mole candidates!

 Mellie and Hal: It would be incredibly shocking if the first lady turned out to be the mole. However Mellie has her own political aspirations and what better way to give them a kick start than to derail the Grant administration. I think it has become clear that Hal has, albeit secretly, shown his allegiance to the first lady rather than the president with subtle looks and gestures. As one of Fitz’s primary secret service officers he is exposed to many secrets within the administration and, along with the first lady, the two have a high degree of security clearance. We can’t forget that Mellie didn’t want Fitz to leave the limo the day of his shooting (was she having second thoughts?). Unless I’m mistaken we still don’t know who hired Becky as the shooter (…or robot-controlled shooter?)

Screen Shot 2013-05-09 at 5.56.23 PMSally Langston and Hollis Doyle: Though we haven’t seen VP Langston in a while, I don’t doubt that she is still plotting to become president. Again we haven’t seen Hollis Doyle stomping through the hallways of the White House in quite some time but sometimes an absence says enough. Since this is a Shonda Rhimes show, I can’t help but bring up Grey’s Anatomy‘s fifth season where George O’Malley (portrayed by T.R. Knight) was noticeably absent throughout the season so when it was revealed that he in fact was the John Doe they were operating on during the season finale, it came as a shock since viewers were accustomed to his lack of screen time. Although Sally has been the pinnacle of moral conduct, Hollis isn’t afraid to get down and dirty. Election rigging, the Cytron explosions, he has gone through a lot for the Grant administration and if he feels that he isn’t getting his end of the bargain, his record illustrates that he wouldn’t be opposed to implementing a change.  With Hollis’s resources (how many people really have the means to rig a national election) and Sally’s position, I can see how they would have access to such top secret information. If Billy Chambers was still alive I would definitely add him as a suspect but that requires many assumptions (assuming Charlie didn’t kill him for one) and many IF’s.

fitz jakeFitz and Jake: A truly shocking combination. However I could somehow see this duo come into fruition. Fitz wanting to prove to everyone involved in Defiance that he could overcome an adverse situation (on his own) and Jake of course has the the know-how to fill in the blanks. Yes orchestrating your own shooting, is a bit of a stretch but hey this is TV! Fitz came to Jake at a time when he didn’t trust anyone else, so it would only make sense for Jake to be his ally if he were to pull off this huge debacle! With Fitz coming out as the mole and Jake coming out as his accomplice (he did say he only took orders directly from Fitz), I have not doubt that Jake’s relationship with Olivia would in turn be revealed; causing another rift in the duo that is POPUS or Olitz whatever you want to call them.

David Rosen and James: The people you would least expect! The duo grew closer during the Defiance investigations and although James had the opportunity to condemn Cyrus, bringing down the administration may be closer to what he’s after? David who has been growing closer and closer to Olivia Pope and Associates has been in the office long enough to gather some dirty secrets of his own to use as blackmail. Losing his job, reputation and career are not feelings to be taken lightly. Although they both aren’t powerful enough to have the means or security clearance on their own, they are well connected to powerful people. Blackmail can be a powerful thing. I do think that its a bit convenient that James suddenly got his journalist job back in time to interview Mellie (could a James and Mellie duo be a possibility?) for arguably the biggest interview of the year. Although he has forgiven Cyrus, and it seems that David has forgiven Olivia, they are both men of integrity and may excuse their behaviour in the name of justice.

Other Possible Suspects

Cyrus Beene: Cyrus is a power hungry pitbull who would likely jump at the chance of having ultimate,unquestioned control of the White House. Although they basically told us last week that is wasn’t him, given that he now seems like the obvious choice. Again this is a Shonda Rhimes show and sometimes the obvious choice turns out to be the correct one (another Grey’s reference but Izzie having a brain tumour anyone? Shonda specifically said Izzie didn’t have cancer and yet look what was revealed). Cyrus was almost willing to kill his husband and who knows what he would have done to Olivia, this pitbull is close to jumping the fence.

Edison Davis: It seems that he has deduced Olivia’s relationship with the president and jealously can be a fickle friend. Although he certainly doesn’t have the security clearance  and  at the time Fitz’s shooting wouldn’t make much sense, never underestimate how far a jealous individual will go.

Top Chef Season 10 finale

Caution SPOILERS up ahead!!

So last night marked the crowning of the 10th Top Chef. Although I would have been happy with any of the top 3 winning, this season has almost been overcast by all the controversy, bias and potential rigging. I’m a big fan of Top Chef, I’ve been watching the show since its first season in 2006 and have watched every season since; except for one (passed on season 3, I found season 2 to be a disappointment).

I do feel like this show goes in circles for me. I was about 14 years old when the first season of Top Chef aired, and I was hooked. In all honestly this is probably around the time when I first started becoming interested, and subsequently obsessed, with food.I found season 2 to be a let down, although a reality show there seemed to be a greater focus on drama as opposed to the food (don’t get me wrong season 1 had all kinds of drama). I mean do we all remember when Elia Aboumrad shaved her head pictured to to the left, or the distasteful moment where Cliff Crooks almost forcibly shaved fellow contestant Marcel Vigneron’s puffy locks as the rest of the cheftestants just watched?

loved each of these cheftestants from Top Chef: Las Vegas (ie season 6)

That season left such a bad taste in my mouth that I couldn’t bring myself to watch the 3rd. I watched the 4th and 5th season out of boredom, curiosity and habit. However all was redeemed with season 6, *sigh*, oh season 6. Undoubtably my favourite, where the focus really seemed to be on the food.  Unfortunately, in my eyes, the show seems to be on a downward again. Enough with my recap of seasons past, lets get to last nights finale!

I’ve had my suspicions of rigging throughout Season 10 of Top Chef. And I know what you’re probably thinking, this is a reality show…of course its rigged! Which may in fact be true however it seemed to be SO obvious this season that even a toddler could see it!

Now don’t get me wrong I am a big fan of Kristen Kish (Season 10 WINNER!) and was glad to see her win the big prize, however it all seemed a bit too planned. Kristen was clearly both a fan and a judge favourite throughout the show, however everybody loves an underdog story and I without a doubt feel that her elimination during Restaurant Wars (image below) was pre-planned for added drama.

Because there was such a strong backlash from the fanbase against both Padma and Tom, I don’t know if it was just the editing but Padma seemed to be gunning for Kristen to go home, it does slightly taint Kristen’s Last Chance Kitchen win. Particularly during her battle with Lizzie Binder. Tom was praising Lizzie’s dish up and down, going for a second and third bite and calling it a perfect dish. Kristen’s on the other hand was called chewy and too much of a mouth-full, yet somehow Kristen scored the win? Now I for one felt a bias from Tom as CJ Jacobsen kept winning challenge after challenge. And don’t even get me started on how poor Kuniko Yagi, didn’t get a fighting chance on either the show or on Last Chance Kitchen…she had to battle 2 chefs, how is that fair!?!?!

But back to the finale.

I HATED the format of the finale. It felt like an even cheesier version of Iron Chef but without the camera work or the play by play that make that show. If you’re going to blatantly copy another show’s format, you would think they would use the best aspects of the show. What I love about the finale of seasons past was the progression of the meal, giving chefs ample time just to cook great food for a reasonable number of guests without all the theatrics. Really, cooking for 300 people in 3 hours in a live stadium was someone’s idea of a good finale? I did like seeing all the past winners of Top Chef in the audience, however I would have much preferred a more intimate finale in a regular dining room setting with the 5 head judges, the 9 previous winners and (as is typical to Top Chef) the owner of the location/vineyard/restaurant. Leave the theatrics to Iron Chef or use them in a quickfire or an elimination challenge. Not the finale.

I love how I can recognize and name each of the past winners 🙂

I like watching the chefs get judged on their overall meal progression and how each dish goes along with the past course. It has a greater sentiment and as a viewer it truly feels like you’re witnessing a raw version of each chef on a plate. Somehow all of that was lost in this finale, which felt distant, cheesy and rushed. Why didn’t we get to see each chef during their menu planning? Why didn’t we get to see them purchase their ingredients, or like Iron Chef were they pre-provided? Why didn’t we get to see how the sous chefs were picked? I have a hard time believing Brooke would let Kristen have the last 3 eliminated contestants on her team in favour of chefs who were eliminated very early on.

I’ve read various comments on last nights finale, and many people seem to think that the actual judging of the finale was rigged. While it may have been, I didn’t find it to be that obtrusive. Brooke did serve burnt pig ears…and chicken wings. This is exactly what I was talking about with a lack of meal progression. Going from scallops to chicken wings to red snapper?? Not exactly a co-hesive menu. However by the end of round 3 it was clear that Kristen would be the winner, there just wasn’t enough time for a 5th round!  It took away any suspense from the already emotionless finale. I do think that Kristen is an incredibly talented chef and I have no doubts that she could have won on her own merit. However with all the producer and outside influence this season has definitely been tainted.

Cancellation News: Partners

Noooooooooooo!

Yep, pretty sure that was my exact reaction to hearing the news. Partners, the CBS single-camera comedy was undoubtably my favourite TV offering of the 2012 year. Its rare for me to re-watch episodes, even of shows that I love (e.g. Modern Family, Grey’s Anatomy…back in its prime). However I’ve watched the 6 aired episodes at least twice each, and with some (Episodes 2 and 3) that number is probably closer to 5. This smart comedy was written by David Kohan and Max Mutchnik, the creative duo behind Will & Grace, one of my favourite comedies. The show is filled with double entendres but has a lot of heart.

Parters stars (starred?) Michael Urie and David Krumholtz as Louis McManus and Joe Goodman respectively. They play two lifelong friends who are business partners in an architecture firm. Louis is a gay man who is in a relationship with his boyfriend Wyatt (Brandon Routh) a male nurse, while Joe is a straight male who is recently engaged to Ali Landow (Sophia Bush). While I haven’t been a fan of Brandon Routh’s acting abilities, I’ve always found him to be stiff and lacking emotion, this character really works in his favour. Wyatt is a Mennonite, and while his portrayal doesn’t come off as entirely natural, I still enjoy when he is on the screen.

The weakest link in the series for me has to be Louis and Joe’s receptionist Ro-Ro, played by Tracey Vilar. Her portrayal comes off as a very one-note caricature and I don’t find her to meld well with the rest of the cast. I wish they had gone with a different actress. I’m also unsure of Sophia Bush in a comedy role. I find her to be a bit stiff but she seemed to get better and more comfortable with each coming episode. I loved the chemistry between Michael Urie and David Krumholtz, the reason I started watching the show was because I missed having Michael Urie on my screen!

With only 6 of the 13 shot episodes aired, I truly hope that CBS decides to either air the remaining 7 episodes or release the full 13 on a DVD. This is a show that I could see myself watching over and over again so I’m pretty bummed that it won’t be on my television anymore.

CBS cancelled the show on November 16th 2012, immediately removing it from the schedule and instead airing Two and a Half men repeats. The show’s online page and episodes were subsequently removed and its People’s Choice online ballet was removed. I recently learned that all 13 filmed episodes are being aired in South Africa so I am crossing my fingers, toes and anything else I can find that I will be able to find the remaining episodes online somewhere.

Ramble Geek: Emmy 2012 Snubs

So the 2012 Emmy nominations have been released, you can see a full list of nominations here. The list may seem a bit stale with the same actors/shows being nominated over and over (and OVER) again. If you were the type of person who believed the Emmy committee nominated only the best quality shows (quality should always prevail over popularity right?) you may just think that we are going through a bit of a TV rut. *Sigh* oh how committee’s can be so wrong.

Now I am a HUGE Modern Family fan (who doesn’t love some Manny Delgato in their life) however I am pretty abashed just how much they’ve dominated the awards the past 2 years. I’m sorry but it is just a slap in the face for ANY TV show to have their entire cast nominated, especially where there are SO many deserving shows. I’m astounded that Julie Bowen has been nominated for the second time, when has she ever been funny on the show!?!? In my opinion Claire, although necessary to calm the craziness that is the extended family, has always been a stale point on the show. You don’t really look forward to Claire centered episodes but you can see what she adds to the story. Community, Parks and Recreation, The Walking Dead although not part of my must watch TV repertoire, these are shows producing great content and are truly undeserving of their lack of recognition.

Then of course there are the long time Emmy snubs. Gilmore Girls, Battle Star Galactica, Buffy the Vampire Slayer the list goes on and on of quality shows with great writing who have never received the recognition (from the academy) that they deserve. Take a show such as House. Hugh Laurie and Robert Sean Leonard are both equally deserving of the golden hardware over the years and yet somehow came out empty handed. While many will admit that the show dwindled over the years it is still an incredible snub for the show to walk out with zero nominations after their final year. I mean how has Hugh Laurie been nominated 5 times (in a row) and 6 times total and yet he has never won the category?!?

Of course the biggest snub in my eyes has got to Fringe. I will gladly call myself part of their devoted fan base. The show has been producing quality and interesting content for 4 seasons and has yet to receive any nominations. It is disgusting that John Cryer is nominated year after year (yes he is nominated in a different category but really….has he ever been funny?) when the brilliance that is John Noble goes un-noticed.This is just another instance where awards shows are demonstrating just how irrelevant they are becoming. We’ve been hearing for quite some time now that the ratings for these awards shows are declining. Maybe instead of hiring someone ‘funnier,’ ‘edgier’ or ‘more relevant’ to be the host we should focus on recognizing the show that are putting out fantastic content and the actors and actresses who are really showing their skills. Yes this post may seem like more of a rant than a ramble but I was thoroughly surprised when I saw the nomination list.

The Emmy’s will be held Sunday September 23rd on ABC with Jimmy Kimmel serving as host.